2025 Budget Raises $125M in New County Taxes


At the first public hearing on the 2025 PBC County budget on 9/10, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted 6-1 to maintain a flat millage of 4.5. Commissioner Baxter was the sole holdout and argued that everything costs more now and with the large runup in property values, the taxpayers could have used a break by reducing the millage slightly. Last year, the rate was reduced about 5% from 4.715 to the current 4.5. There was no support for this position from the other board members as Commissioner Marino (who pushed for last year’s reduction) was not on board, and Mayor Sachs pointed out that the county expenses were higher too, and paying higher taxes is just an indication that your property is worth more.

Flat millage is far enough above the roll-back rate so as to require a super majority vote. It represents an increase in collected ad-valorem taxes of about $125M, up 9.6% since last year. On an inflation adjusted per capita basis, each of our 1.5 million residents is responsible for $898 (2024 dollars). This is up from $646 just 10 years ago in FY 2015.

This year sees another 6% across the board salary increase (worth $18M) on top of 6% last year. County employees never have to worry about inflation.

Some other increases in Ad-Valorem expenses in this budget:

+ $70M for the Sheriff – this is a 8.0% increase, yet the PBSO share of the total budget has declined to 59.0% from a peak of 66.4% in 2020 given large increases in other county areas
+ $39M for Housing and Economic Development (+26%)
+ $97M for Palm Tran (+50%)
+ $39M in capital projects
+ $50M for budgeted reserves, to $1.9B (22% of planned expenditures).
+ $53M for Fire/Rescue operations
The supervisor of elections budget request has declined by $8M (-26%) as 2025 is an off year.

Total staffing is increasing by 110 to 12,536, with the biggest increases in Fire-Rescue (+27 to 1882) and PBSO (+16 to 4505).

The final public hearing will be held on September 17th at 5:05pm.


2024 Budget Raises $100M in New Property Taxes


At the first public hearing on the 2024 PBC County budget on 9/7, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) followed through with their intention to reduce the millage by about 5% from 4.715 to 4.500. As in July, the vote was unanimous.

A reduction in the millage of that much was a bit of a surprise in June as staff had recommended keeping it flat, and the change reduces the original county-wide ad-valorem tax proposal by $62M. Kudos to Commissioner Marino for suggesting the change and getting the rest of the board to follow her lead.

That said, the county-wide property tax burden is still going up by 8.5% since taxable valuations have climbed almost 15% since last year. That is an increase of $102M. Where is the new money going you ask? Much of it goes to a 6% across the board increase for every employee. This is on top of 3% a year, every year for the last nine (34% from 2014).

Some other increases:

  • $54M more for the Sheriff – this is a 7.5% increase, yet the PBSO share of the total budget has declined to 59.5% from a peak of 66.4% in 2020
  • $105M increase in reserves. The $1.6B in reserves are now 32% of budgeted expenditures, up from 28% one year ago.
  • $29M increase in BCC operations net of revenues
  • $85M in capital projects
  • $12M increase for the Supervisor of elections, now at $34M (55% increase). Next year is a Presidential election year, but the budget in 2020 was only $16M so it is more than doubled. At the hearing, the majority of speakers addressed this line item and there appears to be an upswell of angst about the conduct of elections in Palm Beach County. This budget increase does not help that much.

The Fire / Rescue budget (separate taxing district, paid only if your town does not have its own F/R) has increased over 10% to $529M.

Total staffing is increasing by 66 to 12,369.

The final public hearing will be held on September 26th at 5:05pm.

2023 County Budget – 13% Tax Increase in Spite of Small Millage Drop

The final proposed county budget for FY 2023 will be voted on at the September 20th BCC Public Hearing at 5:05PM.

The final budget hearing for the 2023 budget will be held on Tuesday, September 20th at 5:05PM in the BCC chambers,
301 N. Olive Street, 6th floor.

Links:

Watch the meeting on Channel 20.

In the summer workshops, the BCC voted to reduce the millage by about 1.6% to 4.7150. This is the first millage change since 2012 when it was increased during the depths of the real estate valuation slump. Even with this minor reduction, the tax burden is up 13.4%. This is so much over the rollback rate that it will take a super majority of the Commission to enact.

It is a budget unlike the last few years in that it is presented in a time of uncontrolled inflation. When prices for everything are rising at an average 8.6% rate, governments just like people must find a way to increase their revenue or cut their spending. Having the power to tax of course, means governments can do just fine while the rest of us suffer.

With close to flat millage (with rising valuations), 6% salary increases for staff across the board and a tax increase over the previous year of about 13.4%, the county’s budget proposal doesn’t appear to subscribe to the “cut the spending” response to inflation.

Total County-wide tax is up $141M to $1.2B, on top of the penny sales tax (infrastructure surcharge) of another $94M (estimated). After many years of small budget increases, the BCC ad-valorem funded departments are going to town. Inside the overall 13% increase, the Sheriff is only asking for 5.5%, while the rest of the departments’ growth is an astounding 27%!

To be fair, with the Federal Reserve printing money to accommodate the Biden Administration’s excessive spending (the $2 Trillion “rescue plan” went right into the M2 money supply), it is prudent for the county to expect much higher costs going forward and padding the budget a little. I expect we will see that on the municipal level as well during the summer. If you look at the “County Wide Tax Per Capita” chart below, when shown in 2022 dollars taxation in flattening out.

For some perspective, during the last 11 years of flat millage (2012-2023), the ad-valorem tax per capita in Palm Beach County rose from $451 to $793, a 73% increase during a time of a 41% change in the consumer price index (much of that in the last year).

Here are some items in the budget of note:

  1. $3.4M is allocated for “Compensation Study Phase III”, the third and final installment “… to review and compare the local employment market to determine the competitiveness of the County’s salary ranges, obtain valuable employee feedback relating to their perception of the County as an employer, and to review each and every job classification to ensure it reflects the actual work being performed and that the associated class structure is appropriate.” Since this year’s 6% increase comes on top of 3% a year for the last 8 (30% in total), we wonder if the study will find that county staffers are overpaid. No, I didn’t think so.
  2. As mentioned, after eight years of 3% cost of living (COLA) increases across the board, adding an ongoing $7.3M per year, this year’s 6% makes it 34% over the 9 years – a period when inflation was about 19%. County employees are doing pretty well as a result. For example, the average total compensation (salary plus benefits) for an employee in a sampling of departments looks like:
    • Fire / Rescue: $188K
    • Sheriff (including part time crossing guards, etc.): $168K
    • Information Technology: $124K
    • Office of Management and Budget: $120K
    • Parks and Recreation: $94K
    • Palm Tran: $98K
    • Engineering and Public Works: $87K
  3. The budget for the Supervisor of Elections is growing about 9% to $21.8M on top of 28% last year.. This includes a net gain of 5 staff. During the 2020 election season, our Supervisor accepted $6.8M from the foundation funded by Mark Zuckerberg, The Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL). (“Zuck Bucks”) According to Breitbart, $1.3M remains unspent. See: Palm Beach County, Florida, Supervisor of Elections Claims ‘No Legal Obligation to Immediately Return’ $1.3 Million to Zuckerberg-Funded CTCL

Some other items of interest:

  • Valuations are estimated at about $255 billion, up about 15% over  a year ago.
  • With slightly smaller millage (4.7150), this valuation will generate more than $1.2 Billion in ad-valorem taxes, up $141M (13.3%) over last year.
  • There will be 97 new BCC funded positions, 16 of them ad-valorem funded.
  • General Fund reserves are being increased to $262M, 14% of general fund revenues (was $189M, so up 39% over last year)
  • The Sheriff will see a $38M ad-valorem increase (5.5%). This includes money for 16 new deputies
  • Library and Fire/Rescue will also see flat millage, yielding increases of $8.1M and $44.2M respectively.

2022 Budget Workshop on Tuesday, June 15

The proposed county budget for FY 2022 will be presented at the June 15 BCC workshop at 6:00PM.

The first budget workshop for the 2022 budget will be held on Tuesday, June 15 at 6PM in the BCC chambers,
301 N. Olive Street, 6th floor.

Links:

Watch the meeting on Channel 20.

It is a budget not unlike the last few years, with flat millage (with rising valuations), 3% COLA increases across the board and a tax increase over the previous year of about 4.8%.

Total County-wide tax is up $49M to $1.05B, on top of the penny sales tax (infrastructure surcharge) of another $80M (estimated).

For some perspective, during the last 10 years of flat millage (2012-2022), the ad-valorem tax per capita in Palm Beach County rose from $451 to $710, a 57% increase during a time of a 25% change in the consumer price index (much of that in the last few months).

Some items in the budget that should raise a few eyebrows:

  1. $3.2M is allocated for “Compensation Study Phase II”. The fall budget workshop estimated an additional $10M would be needed to fully complete phase II. Although not described in the package, we believe this is a continuation from the study by Evergreen Solutions back in 2018 and 19, whose purpose was: “… to review and compare the local employment market to determine the competitiveness of the County’s salary ranges, obtain valuable employee feedback relating to their perception of the County as an employer, and to review each and every job classification to ensure it reflects the actual work being performed and that the associated class structure is appropriate.” See: Evergreen Study
  2. This is the eighth year of a 3% cost of living (COLA) increase across the board, adding an ongoing $7.3M per year. This amounts to 27% over the 8 years – a period when inflation was about 16%. County employees are doing pretty well as a result. For example, the average total compensation (salary plus benefits) for an employee in a sampling of departments looks like:
    • Fire / Rescue: $177K
    • Sheriff (including part time crossing guards, etc.): $145K
    • Information Technology: $117K
    • Office of Management and Budget: $113K
    • Parks and Recreation: $89K
    • Palm Tran: $92K
    • Engineering and Public Works: $82K
  3. The budget for the Supervisor of Elections is growing 28% to $19.9M. This includes a net gain of 4 staff. During the 2020 election season, our Supervisor accepted $6.8M from the foundation funded by Mark Zuckerberg, The Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL). (“Zuck Bucks”) According to Breitbart, $1.3M remains unspent. See: Palm Beach County, Florida, Supervisor of Elections Claims ‘No Legal Obligation to Immediately Return’ $1.3 Million to Zuckerberg-Funded CTCL

Some other items of interest:

  • Valuations are estimated at about $221 billion, up about 4.9% over  a year ago.
  • With flat millage (4.7815), this valuation will generate more than $1 Billion in ad-valorem taxes, up $49M (4.8%) over last year.
  • There will be 83 new BCC funded positions, 8 of them ad-valorem funded.
  • General Fund reserves are being increased to $194M, 11.6% of general fund revenues (was $176M, so up 12% over last year)
  • The Sheriff will see a $33M ad-valorem increase (5.1%). This includes money for 35 new deputies
  • Library and Fire/Rescue will also see flat millage, yielding increases of $2.1M and $11.4M respectively.

2021 Budget Workshop on June 16

The proposed county budget for FY 2021 will be presented at the June 16 BCC workshop at 6:00PM.

The first budget workshop for the 2021 budget will be held on Tuesday, June 16 at 6PM in the BCC chambers,
301 N. Olive Street, 6th floor.

Links:

It is a budget not unlike the last few years, with flat millage (with rising valuations), 3% COLA increases across the board and a tax increase over the previous year about 5.8%.

Total County-wide tax is up $54.7M to $1.0B, on top of the penny sales tax (infrastructure surcharge) of another $84M (estimated).

For some perspective, during the last 9 years of flat millage (2012-2021), the ad-valorem tax per capita in Palm Beach County rose from $451 to $685, a 52% increase during a time of a 12% change in the consumer price index.

Some items of interest:

  1. Valuations are estimated at about $210 billion, up about 4.9% over  a year ago.
  2. With flat millage (4.7815), this valuation will generate more than $1 Billion in ad-valorem taxes for the first time, up $54.7M (5.1%) over last year.
  3. There will be 146 new BCC funded positions, 26 of them ad-valorem funded.
  4. General Fund reserves are being increased to $177M, 11.2% of general fund revenues (was $154M, so up 15% over last year)
  5. A 3% COLA for all BCC employees will cost $7.0M.  This is the seventh year in a row – a 22% across-the-board raise over 7 years. During the same period, inflation was about 7.4%.
  6. The Sheriff will see a $21.7M ad-valorem increase, which is a net $31.8M (+5.1%) considering carry-forwards and increased revenue. This includes money for 27 new deputies
  7. Library and Fire/Rescue will also see flat millage, yielding increases of $3.1M and $16.3M respectively.
  8. Palm Tran is seeing a big boost of $14.1M (11%), 4.8M of that from ad-valorem.

The BCC priorities were funded, with $3.4M for business incentives, $89.2M for infrastructure (including Palm Tran vehicles), $17.6M for Housing/Homelessness (including “non-congregate” shelters), and $2.5M for substance use and behavior disorders.

2020 Budget Workshop on June 10

The proposed county budget for FY 2020 will be presented at the June 10 BCC workshop at 6:00PM.

The first budget workshop for the 2020 budget will be held on Monday, June 10 at 6PM in the BCC chambers,
301 N. Olive Street, 6th floor.

Links:

It is a budget not unlike the last few years, with flat millage (with rising valuations), 3% COLA increases across the board and a tax increase over the previous year about 5.5%.

Total County-wide tax is up $49.1M to $947M, on top of the penny sales tax (infrastructure surcharge) of another $73M.

For some perspective, during the time of flat millage (2012-2020), the ad-valorem tax per capita in Palm Beach County rose from $505 to $652, a 29% increase during a time of 10% inflation.

Some items of interest:

  1. Valuations are estimated at about $198 billion, up about 5.3% over  a year ago.
  2. With flat millage (4.7815), this valuation will generate $947 Million in ad-valorem taxes, up $49.1M (5.5%) over last year.
  3. There will be 170 new BCC funded positions, 32 of them ad-valorem funded.
  4. General Fund reserves are being increased to $154M, 10.4% of general fund revenues (was $131M, so up 18% over last year)
  5. A 3% COLA for all BCC employees will cost $6.7M.  This is the sixth year in a row – a 19% across-the-board raise over 6 years. During the same period, inflation was just shy of 10%.
  6. The Sheriff will see a $38.2M ad-valorem increase, which is a net $47.7M (+4.7%) considering carry-forwards and increased revenue. This includes money for 10 new deputies
  7. Library and Fire/Rescue will also see flat millage, yielding increases of $3.0M and $14.8M respectively.
  8. Palm Tran is seeing a big boost of $15M (11%), 9.9M of that from ad-valorem.

The BCC priorities were funded, with $52M for Housing/Homelessness, and $2.6M for substance use and behavior disorders.

Last year the supervisor of elections, which has had a flat budget in the $10M range over the 5 years saw a 142% increase to $22M.  This was for equipment upgrades getting ready for the 2020 election, and this year’s budget has been decreased by about $4M to $17M – still high by historical standards.

Commission and School Board Candidate Forum

On October 1, TAB, along with the South Florida 912 and the Palm Beach County Tea Party, hosted a candidate forum for County Commission district 1 and School Board district 1. Moderated by Steve Rosenblum of the blogTalkRadio show “CRF Radio with Steve and Daria”, the candidates were asked a set of questions about current issues facing their respective bodies, some of which proved to offer a real choice between the candidates. Present for the forum (and keeping them honest) was outgoing Commissioner Karen Marcus, who we thank for her service, and several of Mayor Levy’s councilmen, Bert Premuroso and Eric Jablin.

The School Board event matched former Minnesota Commissioner of Education Christine Jax against long term PBC teacher and principal Mike Murgio.

When asked about how to fix the general perception that the quality of local schools are poor and an impediment to attracting new businesses or hiring from out of the state, Mr. Murgio was defensive about it and claimed that the schools were “better than you think”, and that what we need is better marketing. Ms. Jax agreed that marketing was needed, but also pointed out areas of weakness, particularly at the high school level, that need action. On “high stakes testing”, Christine was firmly in favor of measurements and against “social promotion” while Mike narrowly defined it in terms of the vocational certifications achieved by students at Inlet Grove when he was its principal. Whether graduates can pass their nursing certification is important, but he did not address the wider measurement of academic performance. On school choice, Christine favors private for-profit charter schools where Mike does not. On the subject of the School System Inspector General (as opposed to the independent county OIG), Mike was hopeful that the current IG relationship can work, but would have accepted OIG oversight. Ms. Jax was emphatic – “having an IG on your payroll is just silly – you have to have someone from the outside.”

Moving on to the County Commission race, Democrat Palm Beach Gardens Mayor David Levy, a geologist, contended with past PBG Councilman and Republican Hal Valeche, a financial consultant.

On the budget, Hal gave a vote of support for TABOR measurements that constrain spending to match inflation and population growth. David favors improving efficiency while still providing core services, streamlining the organization chart and reorganizing the IT department. Neither were proponents of the counties giving tax dollars to private charities. On the issue of public safety unions, Hal (who has their support), doesn’t want to “whack anyone over the head”, but believes we need a glide path for pay and benefits to approach the norm. David was more direct – “The fire union was going to bankrupt the city”, he said, “they told me they’re coming after me, but I’m always going to do what’s right.” Neither was particulary supportive of large county cash infusions into the convention center hotel project, and Hal pointed to the Digital Domain fiasco as a reason to avoid such investments in the future, where the private company gets the reward and the taxpayer takes the risk. On the issue of the Inspector General lawsuit, Mayor Levy defended his role in bringing PBG into the lawsuit and said it was all about how the funding was calculated. Hal retorted that if he really wanted to end the lawsuit he should propose that to his council and we should let the IG get on with her business.

Below you will find a summary of the event, with the questions that were asked, and a link to a video of that section of the forum.

For the Palm Beach Post story on the event, see: Candidates for northern Palm Beach County commission seat spar at forum

School Board
Opening Statement:
Question 1: The school system has a budget of about $2.4B and an enrollment of 174,866 students, which is almost $14K per student, compared to $10,615 per student nationwide. In addition to 12,627 teachers, there are 8183 non-teachers, or about 40% of the total, and teachers average $46,946 / year, compared to about $60,000 in the non-bargaining classification (office workers and administrators). Would you want to make changes to the way the budget is allocated? How much could be done by the School Board.
Question 2: Much has been written and discussed about the drawbacks of the FCAT, the incentives to “teach the test”, etc. Yet many believe that objective measurements are necessary to identify weak as well as outstanding schools and act accordingly. At least one of you has supported the concept of “high stakes testing” as a prerequisite to improvement. What changes would you like to see in this area and what can be done locally at the school board level?
Question 3: Many believe that continuous improvement is enhanced by competition, and giving parents a choice to move to a better performing school will improve all the schools. There are several approaches being tried, including charter schools within the public system, vouchers for use at private or religious schools, and other innovations. Most of these approaches are opposed by the teachers unions and school administration alike. What is your view of implementing school choice?
Question 4: It is no secret that the reputation of the county school system is less than excellent. On a recent panel discussion on economic development in the county, this was listed by several of the panelists as a major impediment to attracting new businesses and for existing companies to recruit employees from out of the area. What can be done about this problem?
Question 5: There are many areas for waste, fraud and abuse in a school system the size of Palm Beach County, with its 20,000 employees and $2.4B budget. Although many county agencies have adopted the oversight of the office of inspector general, the school system has decided to go with their own IG structure that some would say is less independent than the county OIG. What is your view of this issue and how do you see the system IG office evolving over time?
Question 6: At the September 12 meeting, the School Board set their initial 2013 legislative priorities: The pension lawsuit, charter school accountability, local flexibility such as charter school waivers, restoring funds and merit pay issues. What are your priorities for the next legislative session?
County Commission
Opening Statement:
Question 1: With property valuations bottoming out, there is less pressure this year on programs and tax rates. Assuming we see increasing valuations in future years, how can we prevent the explosion of spending that occurred during the last period of rising property values? What can you say to the employees who want raises and the special interests that want more funding for their programs?
Question 2: Each year in the budget, about $13M is allocated to “Financially Assisted Agencies” or FAA. These grants are given to community organizations such as the Salvation Army, Goodwill and the Lord’s Place, which are mostly supported by private charitable giving. Is this an appropriate use of county taxpayer money which amounts to $10 for each resident of the county?
Question 3: Public Employee Unions have been very successful in obtaining generous salary and benefits for their members. In the county, what the PBA has obtained for PBSO employees and the IAFF for Fire/Rescue exceeds that for equivalent positions elsewhere. Given that one of you has recently been involved in rolling back some benefits at the municipal level, and the other has received campaign contributions from them, how would you approach this major part of the budget in future years?
Question 4: The current commission has voted 6-1 to proceed with planning for a 400 bed “headquarters hotel” adjacent to the convention center. They have proposed a $27M direct subsidy, $20M in loan guarantees and the land worth $10M on which it is t be built. Proponents say this is necessary to make the convention center competitive, although many think 400 rooms are not enough. The convention center is currently losing over $6M / year including debt service, and it is has not been shown that a hotel will make it profitable. Is this just good money after bad? Have you looked at the financials of the proposal? What should be done about the convention center.
Question5: The county has many beautiful parks and green space that add to our quality of life, and areas that are environmentally sensitive have been protected. When the economy improves and more land in PBC is developed, how would you maintain a balance between no-growth environmental activism and overly prolific development?
Question 6: Much has been written about the cities lawsuit against the Inspector General. In June, Andrew Marra in the Palm Beach Post commented “not all municipalities see the inspector general’s enhanced oversight — demanded overwhelmingly by voters in 2010 — as something to be resisted and feared.” As a commissioner, would you support the letter and the spirit of the IG ordinances? Why do you think some cities are resisting oversight?

County Commission Forum – District 1 Primary Candidates

On June 18, eight grassroots, civic and political clubs came together to sponsor a candidate debate for the County Commission District 1 primary on August 14. Moderated by local radio personality Tom Boyhan, the three candidates were asked six questions of county-wide interest, chosen from a list of twelve that had been given to the candidates in advance. They were also asked for a brief opening and closing statement. Below you will find a summary of the event, with the questions, their answers, and a link to a video of that section of the forum.

Click on the candidate’s picture for a short biography.

The event was well attended, and quite a few elected officials joined us, including: District 1 Commissioner Karen Marcus, from Palm Beach Gardens Mayor David Levy, Vice Mayor Bert Premuroso, and council members Joe Russo and Marcie Tinsley, Juno Beach Vice Mayor Bill Greene, Tequesta Mayor Tom Paterno, Lake Worth Vice Mayor Scott Maxwell, Jupiter Inlet District Commissioner Patricia Walker, Republican State Committewoman Fran Hancock, and PBCGOP Chair Sid Dinerstein.

Sponsors of the event were the PBC Taxpayer Action Board and their coalition partners South Florida 912, Palm Beach County Tea Party, and Singer Island Civic Association, along with the Republican clubs of Palm Beach, Northern Palm Beaches, the Palm Beaches, and the Jupiter/Tequesta Repbublican Organization.


Dan Amero

Harry Gaboian

Hal Valeche

>

Opening Statement:
Dan Amero: Thank you Karen, I will pay attention to Business (cornerstone of our success), Budget (no tax increases at all), Integrity (bring back “IRA”: Integrity, Responsibility, and Accountability)

Harry Gaboian: Filing fee is a very high obstacle for entry, hope I can be a good candidate

Hal Valeche: Local elections are important, thank you to Commissioner Marcus for all she has done, big shoes to fill
Question 1: Recently, a proposal for a half cent sales tax surcharge that would raise $100M per year for Palm Tran expansion and other uses was proposed by staff and a decision was postponed for a year. What is your view of this tax and how would you approach it next year if elected, and what other new sources of revenue would you consider appropriate?
Dan Amero: Oppose, we need public transporation but not at the cost of 90% subsidy

Harry Gaboian: A long way off before we have mass transporation here, need something in the city (museum?) to draw people in

Hal Valeche: Oppose, Palm Tran is inefficient – make it more rational, increase ridership (fares only cover 8%), make it work better
Question 2: Palm Tran is currently 92% subsidized, with fares making up only 8 cents of every dollar in operating costs. Ridership is down and many empty buses travel the existing routes yet staff and some commissioners would like to expand Palm Tran. A recent consultant study recommended (among other things), privatizing Palm Tran and/or raising fares. How would you approach this issue?
Dan Amero: Keep throwing money at it without a plan is ridiculous use of taxpayer money, experiment like the free golf cart transport in Delray Beach

Harry Gaboian: Use small vans run by small business like in the Caribbean

Hal Valeche: Privatization would not eliminate subsidy – need to make profit, don’t raise fares because low-income riders depend on it
Question 3: Attracting businesses and jobs to the county is approached in a number of ways. One is to provide tax incentives and outright payouts for infrastructure development like with Scripps. Another is to subsidize private business like with the convention center hotel. Another way is to make the county attractive as a place to create or expand a business by reducing the tax burden and simplifying the permitting process. What is your preferred approach to economic development?
Dan Amero: Companies are coming anyway, same reason many people have – the lifestyle, beaches, greenspace, etc., Max Plank / Scripps – was lot of money, little to show, lower taxes, lower fees will help our own people as well as attract new businesses

Harry Gaboian: Make the county an attractive place to live and work and that will attract businesses and keep them better than monetary incentives

Hal Valeche: easier permitting, lower taxes as incentives – business friendly environment
Question 4: The county has adopted the “sustainable development” agenda that promotes urban concentration over suburban development, mass transportation, and other “green” issues. Some would say that this will result in erosion of property rights and limits to the way we are allowed to live our lives. What is your understanding of “sustainable development” and how would you deal with the issue if elected?
Dan Amero: Florida Growth Management Act we have to follow, 11M pop growth by 2030, need 1M acres, need to start planning

Harry Gaboian: Agenda 21 is bad, but plans can be flexible – need to build things and work around obstacles

Hal Valeche: The comprehensive plan is a blueprint rather than mandatory, sometimes conflated with Agenda 21 (which is coercive, command and control, not good), county has done good job so far
Question 5: Shoreline erosion and beach replenishment is an ongoing problem for Palm Beach County. Recently, a plan to implement groins to protect the beach at Singer Island was rejected after complaints of the Surfrider Foundation and other environmental groups. What is your view of the Singer Island groin proposal and what should be done about this problem?
Dan Amero: More than just Singer Island problem, 47 miles of coastline, with tourism, “no beach, no dollars”, groins work in Ocean Ridge, need to try something

Harry Gaboian: Against the Corps of Engineers on that one, spent too much on study, go slow, try pilot project, let property owners pay for mitigation

Hal Valeche: Spending millions a year on replacing sand is stupid, we need a long term solution, groins/jetties are the way, Allen West is on board and will help
Question 6: The voters overwhelmingly approved the Inspector General and Ethics Ordinances and their application to municipal as well as county government. 15 cities have sued the county over the planned IG funding mechanism, but many would say it is an attempt to thwart the wishes of the voters. How should this standoff be resolved and what role should the county commission take in resolving it?
Dan Amero: Even though 72% of the voters said we want it, cities don’t want to do it, IG is a good thing for us, she’s making us a better government, I support 100%, you should too

Harry Gaboian: Stay away from it, its not our business, cities rightfully object when someone wants to look at their books

Hal Valeche: Cities should pay what they owe, it is a weak case against it, IG funding is good use of taxpayer money
Closing Statement:
Dan Amero: I’m the small business guy who wants the best for everyone in small business – the backbone of any successful community

Harry Gaboian: Commission doesn’t understand the free market system, lot of people and corporations with their hands out, need to fix that

Hal Valeche: Have record I’m proud of, spent my time on PBG Council looking out for the taxpayer

Some pictures from the event.

Why TAB – Why Now?

County taxes and spending have been a concern for a number of groups and individuals over the years. Many have taken action and tried to slow the growth of spending, pointing out that it was dishonest and irresponsible to take advantage of inflated real estate valuations and homestead caps to run up double digit increases year after year. On balance, these efforts went nowhere. Those who benefit from county spending, whether they are richly funded special interests with something to gain, or loosely organized “user communities” of taxpayer funded programs, have pretty much controlled the agenda. No one who attempted to speak for the taxpayer has gained much traction.

In the most recent past though, conditions have begun to change. In four years, four county commissioners have been arrested and punished. An ethics commission and an office of Inspector General has been established. The community has begun to take notice of what happens in county government, just as they have awakened to the serious challenges we face from the unchecked growth of the federal government.

We are at a tipping point – almost half of Americans don’t pay income tax, but receive benefits from the other half who do. Government employees at all levels receive much higher salaries and benefits than those doing similar work in the private sector, and they are almost totally immune to layoffs when the economy turns sour for the rest of us. This is a trend that will not end well.

There is something in the air – something afoot. People are taking an interest, going to meetings, getting involved in political campaigns. There is a feeling that we are on a precipice and that if we don’t move quickly we will be swept into the void, that the country, the communities in which we live, are about to be irrecoverably changed. And some of us are resisting.

The tea party movement, which is a generic term, encompassing many different groups, large and small, has raised the banner of fiscal responsibilty, smaller government, and free markets. At the local level, we believe that this energy can be directed at righting the ship – at raising the awareness that something is wrong, and convincing the elected leaders of the community that the time has come when we must look at things differently.

It is against this backdrop that TAB has formed to try yet again to get some traction on county spending that has grown much faster than the local economy. The real estate bubble raised valuations so high that the temptation to follow them with government spending was irresistable, though foolish in hindsight.

This is a starting point. We are well aware of the budget issues that exist with the School Board, the Children’s Services Council, the Health Care District, the myriad other taxing authorities that for years have had a free hand. They are all on the TAB radar. For now though, we must focus on the budget under the control of the County Commission.

It must be emphasized that we are concerned with SPENDING, not taxes, fees, transfers, grants, or other sources on the revenue side. It is excessive SPENDING that is the problem – SPENDING within our means – solve that and the revenue side will take care of itself.

Our approach has 4 components:

  • QUESTION – assumptions, staff, program recipients, other jurisdictions
  • PUBLISH – our findings, analysis, speculation, conclusions
  • ENGAGE – staffs, commission, constitutionals
  • SUPPORT – provide cover and support for leaders who share our goals

WE WANT TO BE AN INDEPENDENT RESOURCE FOR LEADERS WILLING TO CHALLENGE THE STATUS QUO

WILL YOU JOIN US?